UntapDownload PDF

Untap Parking Index · Issue 02 · July 2026

Second Thoughts

When a parking ticket is challenged, how often does the company defend it?

Published by UntapJuly 2026107,202 appeals · 15.9 million keeper enquiries

A private parking ticket is not a fine. It is an invoice from a company, and like any invoice it can be disputed. Most people never do. Of the just under sixteen million times a parking company asked the driver licensing agency who owned a vehicle in the year to September 2025, only about a hundred thousand disputes reached an independent appeal. That is well under one in a hundred.

This report is about what happened to that small, self-selected hundred thousand. The headline finding is not how often motorists won. It is how often the parking company decided, once a neutral adjudicator was actually going to look at the file, that it would rather not find out.

They knew we would allow the appeals.
POPLA Annual Report 2025, reporting what operators told it about the Appeals Charter
00Executive summary

Five things this report found

01

A third of all appeals were abandoned by the company that issued the ticket

34,502of 107,202 completed appeals

Not lost. Dropped. The operator declined to contest, so the appeal service never ruled. The service gives two reasons: the motorist produced compelling evidence, or the landowner asked the operator to withdraw.

Source: POPLA Annual Report 2025.

02

One large operator walked away from four appeals in every five

82.6%of completed appeals dropped, one national operator

Across operators with meaningful volume the withdrawal rate runs from about 18 per cent to 83 per cent. Two companies facing the same rules behave in opposite ways.

Source: POPLA Annual Report 2025 Appendix; Untap analysis.

03

Whether a challenge succeeds depends more on who issued the ticket than on the facts

7.5% to 43.4%share of ruled appeals won by the motorist

Among operators with at least a thousand completed appeals, the motorist's odds of winning a ruling vary by nearly six times depending on the company name at the top of the notice.

Source: POPLA Annual Report 2025 Appendix; Untap analysis.

04

For a tenth of the market, no outcome data exists at all

10.4%of keeper enquiries, on a scheme that publishes no outcomes

Operators signed to the smaller trade body appeal to a different service, which publishes no allowed or refused figures whatsoever. Its report has a section headed with the word outcomes that ends without a single number.

Source: DVLA KADOE volumes; The Independent Appeals Service Annual Report 2024-25.

05

Keeper lookups are running at a record, and the last quarter has gone unreported

+19.3%April to December 2025 against the same months in 2024

Parking companies made 13,098,550 keeper enquiries between April and December 2025, against 10,976,495 in the same months a year earlier. If the rate holds, the full year lands near 17.2 million, comfortably the highest on record. The data behind this only became available in April 2026 and we have found no published analysis of it.

Source: DVLA, Who DVLA shares data with, KADOE volumes; Untap analysis.

01The finding

A third of parking appeals end because the company gives up

The appeals service reports that just over half of completed appeals ended with the ticket cancelled. (Source: POPLA Annual Report 2025, appeals completed and cancelled.) That figure is accurate but it flatters the process slightly, because it counts appeals the motorist withdrew, and the service's own definitions note those are typically people who had already paid the charge. Strip them out and the share of completed appeals where the motorist walked away owing nothing is 45.8 per cent.

Either way, the interesting number is underneath. Of the 107,202 appeals completed in the year, only 67,680 were actually decided by an adjudicator. The other 39,522 were never contested. In 34,502 of those cases it was the parking company that dropped out.

FIG. 01

At the top of this chart the ticket almost always went away, and mostly because the company stopped defending it

Share of completed appeals by outcome, operators with at least 1,000 completed appeals, October 2024 to September 2025

  • Allowed
  • Operator dropped it
  • Refused

Source: POPLA Annual Report 2025 Appendix; Untap analysis.

Untap

Read the middle band. That is the share of appeals the operator abandoned once it knew someone independent was going to read the file. For one national car park operator it reaches 82.6 per cent. For another large operator running retail and supermarket sites it is 59.1 per cent. At the other end of the same chart, operators contest almost everything and win most of it.

02The league

Your odds depend on whose name is at the top of the notice

The table below is the heart of the report. It is sorted by completed appeals, which is the only ordering that neither flatters nor punishes an operator for its size. Two columns matter most. Allowed is how often the motorist won when an adjudicator actually ruled. Dropped is how often the operator declined to find out.

The table · October 2024 to September 2025

Every operator with at least 250 completed appeals

OperatorKeeper enquiriesAppeals completedAllowedDroppedTicket cancelledAppeals per 1,000
ParkingEye2,482,89723,96723.5%23.3%41.3%9.7
Euro Car Parks1,893,38516,14616.1%59.1%65.7%8.5
Smart Parking780,5937,78841.8%18.5%52.6%10.0
APCOA1,884,3337,45513.0%53.9%59.9%4.0
Civil Enforcement677,0486,71317.4%25.5%38.5%9.9
NCP729,6306,34843.4%82.6%90.2%8.7
UK Parking Control558,6695,1817.5%46.3%50.3%9.3
CP Plus560,6784,78814.7%24.0%35.2%8.5
Horizon Parking950,3604,22712.9%36.9%45.0%4.5
Premier Park233,6473,19211.5%28.0%36.3%13.7
MET Parking Services187,3292,7678.1%36.8%41.9%14.8
ParkMaven466,5491,98941.1%55.1%73.5%4.3
Britannia Parking375,6901,73312.0%27.5%36.2%4.6
Initial Parking80,0411,64410.2%21.6%29.6%20.5
UK Parking Administration123,9721,62115.9%26.3%38.0%13.1
Private Parking Solution (London)82,7051,08916.2%19.8%32.8%13.2
Minster Baywatch85,53990114.0%16.2%28.0%10.5
BaySentry Solutions46,25683933.6%24.1%49.6%18.1
Total Parking Solutions108,94368112.1%32.2%40.4%6.3
First Parking52,42067919.6%18.7%34.6%12.9
Saba Park Solutions53,58650912.6%28.5%37.5%9.5
P4 Parking29,57744322.2%49.2%60.5%15.0
Eternity Fire and Security25,33043324.1%5.3%28.2%17.1
Close Unit Protection31,05338936.1%14.7%45.5%12.5
VARS Technology33,01234211.5%15.8%25.4%10.4
Secure Parking Solutions25,48032621.1%14.1%32.2%12.8
Parking Enforcement and Security Servicesnot matched31812.7%55.3%61.0%n/a
Capital Car Park Control17,84829739.4%5.1%42.4%16.6
Highview Parking38,19129614.4%22.6%33.8%7.8
Parking Group21,12826626.0%13.2%35.7%12.6
Workflow Dynamics19,70826349.4%33.1%66.2%13.3

Allowedis the share of appeals the appeals service decided in the motorist's favour. Dropped is the share the operator chose not to contest, so nobody ruled. Ticket cancelled combines the two: the share of completed appeals after which the motorist owed nothing.

Keeper enquiries are not tickets issued. The agency's own notes say the volumes represent the number of enquiries made and not the number of times keeper information was released, and that they include details of the same vehicle being released more than once. An enquiry only arises once a ticket has gone unpaid. It is the closest public proxy for issuance and nothing more.

Sources: POPLA Annual Report 2025 Appendix; DVLA, Who DVLA shares data with, KADOE enquiry volumes, filtered to Car Parking Management and cut to October 2024 to September 2025; Untap analysis.

The two columns tell different stories and it is worth separating them. A low allowed rate can mean an operator's tickets are sound. It can also mean the operator withdraws from every case it would lose, leaving only its strongest files to be ruled on. The cancelled column, which combines both routes, is the one that answers the question a driver actually has: if I challenge this, what are the chances I end up owing nothing?

03Challenge rates

Some operators are challenged five times more often than others

Volume and outcome are separate questions. An operator can issue enormous numbers of tickets and see very few challenged, or issue relatively few and see them contested constantly. Dividing completed appeals by keeper enquiries in the same twelve months gives a rough challenge rate.

Across matched operators that rate runs from roughly 4 per thousand at the large airport and hospital operators to 20 per thousandat some smaller firms. In other words, some companies' tickets are five times more likely to be taken all the way to an independent appeal.

04The gap

For a tenth of the market, nobody publishes anything at all

Britain has two private parking trade bodies, and each runs its own appeals service. One publishes an appendix naming every operator with its allowed, refused and uncontested totals. That appendix is the basis of this report. The other publishes a ten page annual report containing a section headed with the word outcomes which discusses them in prose and then ends without a single figure. (Source: The Independent Appeals Service Annual Report 2024 to 2025.)

FIG. 02

One fifth of the market by volume has no published appeal outcomes

Keeper-data enquiries by whether the operator's appeal outcomes are published, October 2024 to September 2025

81.6% outcomes published10.4%8%Every operator named, with its allowed and refused totalsNo outcomes published · not matched15,942,399 keeper enquiries, October 2024 to September 2025

Source: DVLA KADOE volumes; POPLA Annual Report 2025 Appendix; The Independent Appeals Service Annual Report 2024-25; Untap analysis.

Untap

What the second service does disclose is still useful. It received 34,383 disputes and recorded 8,907 discontinuations, of which 7,888 were conceded by the parking operator and 1,019 by the motorist. That gives an operator concession rate of 22.9 per cent of disputes received, against 33.1 per cent of appeals received on the other side. What it does not give, anywhere, is how often a motorist won.

05Volume

Keeper lookups are heading for their highest year on record

FIG. 03

Keeper enquiries have more than doubled in six years, and 2025-26 is running ahead of every year before it

Keeper-data enquiries by parking companies, financial years 2018-19 to 2025-26

04.5m9m13.5m18m6.9m2018-198.6m2019-204.5m2020-218.6m2021-2211.1m2022-2312.8m2023-2414.4m2024-2513.1m2025-2611.0msame months, 2024April to December only

Source: DVLA, Who DVLA shares data with, KADOE enquiry volumes, filtered to Car Parking Management; Untap analysis. The final column covers April to December 2025 only.

Untap

The shape is a steady climb, a collapse in the first pandemic year, and then a recovery that has overshot everything before it. The final column is nine months rather than twelve and is drawn hatched for that reason. On a like for like basis, April to December 2025 ran 19.3 per cent ahead of the same nine months in 2024. Carried forward at the same rate the full year would land near 17.2 million.

06The contrast

Councils publish everything private operators do not

A council parking ticket and a private parking ticket look almost identical through a windscreen. The public record behind them does not. For councils, both halves are published per authority: how many tickets were issued, and how many appeals were allowed, refused or conceded, each split by jurisdiction so parking can be read on its own. For private operators, only a proxy for issuance exists, and outcomes are published by one trade body and not the other.

The council figures also make a useful benchmark. In London, 49.4 per centof decided parking appeals went the motorist's way, on 24,899 appeals against 5,171,275 parking tickets issued. (Source: London Councils, Annual Appeals Statistics 2024-25 and Annual PCN Statistics 2024-25, parking only.) Outside London the tribunal allowed 3,363 of 7,482 decided parking appeals, which is 44.9 per cent, of which 1,892 were not contested by the council. (Source: Traffic Penalty Tribunal Annual Report 2024 to 2025, page 8, parking jurisdiction.)

07Methodology

Notes on the data, including what it cannot tell you

Periods do not naturally align. The appeals service reports October to September. The keeper enquiry file is published on an April to March year. Rather than compare mismatched windows, we rebuilt an October to September total from the monthly columns in the published file. Every keeper figure joined to an appeals figure in this report uses that custom window.

Operator names required a hand-built list. One company can hold several separate arrangements with the driver licensing agency, can rename itself mid-series, and can have a debt recovery firm making enquiries on its behalf. Meanwhile genuinely different companies have near-identical names. We matched every operator by hand and recorded the pairs that must never be merged. No fuzzy matching was used, because a first attempt at it silently combined three separate companies and overstated coverage by thirteen percentage points.

Appeals are a small, self-selected tail. Around a hundred thousand appeals sit against just under sixteen million keeper enquiries in the same window. The rates in this report describe appealed tickets, not all tickets. An operator with a high cancellation rate may simply be challenged by more determined motorists. Nothing here supports a claim about the validity of tickets that were never appealed.

The withdrawal figure is not an admission. An operator can drop an appeal for reasons other than expecting to lose, including cost, and the appeals service names two that have nothing to do with the merits: compelling evidence from the motorist, or the landowner asking for the charge to be dropped. We report it because it is published per operator and because the spread between operators is far too wide to be explained by either.

Coverage is 81.6 per cent, and the remainder is two different things. 10.4per cent of keeper enquiries belong to operators we can confirm sit on the other trade body's scheme, which publishes no outcomes. The remaining 8 per cent we simply could not match to an operator in the appeals appendix, and some of those firms do have published outcomes. Only the first group supports a claim that nothing is published, and the report keeps the two apart everywhere.

08Data and sources

Everything in this report, and where to check it

  • POPLA Annual Report 2025 and Appendix, operated by Trust Alliance Group, covering 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025. Appeals decided by operator, and appeals not contested by operator. popla.co.uk/reports
  • DVLA, Who DVLA shares data with, KADOE enquiry volumes, quarterly, filtered to the Car Parking Management business classification. gov.uk
  • The Independent Appeals Service Annual Report 2024 to 2025, covering the same October to September period. theias.org
  • London Councils, parking enforcement and appeals statistics 2024-25, published 27 October 2025. londoncouncils.gov.uk
  • Traffic Penalty Tribunal Annual Report 2024 to 2025, England outside London and Wales. trafficpenaltytribunal.gov.uk

If you have a parking ticket you think is wrong

Our guide to challenging a private parking notice walks through the free route, the grounds that actually win, and the deadlines that matter. It costs nothing and we do not take a share of anything you get back.

Read the parking guide

Published by Untap, July 2026. All underlying data comes from the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency, the two private parking appeals services, London Councils and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal. Untap is a free service that helps people in the UK find money they are already owed. We do not file claims and we do not take a share of any refund.